RacerX wrote:
I give up! Think I'll go see what SCCA, PCA or some other group that has their sh!t together, is running for the 944's and join up with them. Someone high up in NASA is getting a kick back from Toyo and that is whats holding this mess up. They don't want to lose their "golden goose" by just coming out and naming another tire. ...RANT OVER!
Firstly this situation is not a normal situation at all. PCA for example does not have any spec tires so this situation would never happen. PCA does spec Toyo for both 944 spec and Boxsters however. They just may not have be dealing with this yet.
I am not sure what you are implying about Toyo and National kickbacks. I see the National office doing what they can in tough situation given there are multiple classes involved with multiple sizes and lots of varition on the current supply in each region.
I can't speak to the details of their relationship, but with respect to 944-spec we have run on Toyos as spec tire since January 2003. That pre-dates and NASA and Toyo deals. The tire was chosen for our class by our founders based on it life properties as an ideal spec tire for budget class. Were it not for this supply situaton I would be supporting staying on the RA-1 contingency or not. Now some like the Nitto NT01 as well as it appears like it may work for us. I do not have any hard data on it and for now that option is moot given where it is make and the supply issues there. For now at least the NTO1 is just another stop-gap option.